Kimi Prompt Templates (2026): Fill-in-the-Blank

You are a senior [LANGUAGE] engineer. Turn on Thinking. I'm getting this error in [LANGUAGE / FRAMEWORK + version]: [PASTE ERROR].
Here's the relevant code: [PASTE CODE].
What I expected: [EXPECTED]. What happens instead: [ACTUAL]. What I've already tried: [ATTEMPTS].
Trace the root cause step by step. If more than one cause is possible, rank them by likelihood. Give me the corrected code and explain the fix in two sentences, then note any edge case it might miss.

You are a [LANGUAGE] developer. Write a function that does this: [DESCRIBE BEHAVIOR].
Inputs: [INPUTS AND TYPES]. Outputs: [OUTPUT]. Edge cases to handle: [EDGE CASES]. Constraints: [PERFORMANCE / DEPENDENCIES / STYLE].
Write clean, idiomatic code with brief comments on the tricky parts. Then walk through each edge case above to confirm it holds, and list any input you're unsure about.

Refactor this code for readability and maintainability without changing behavior: [PASTE CODE].
Improve naming, reduce nesting, and extract logic where it helps. Keep it idiomatic for [LANGUAGE] and don't add dependencies beyond [ALLOWED DEPENDENCIES].
Return the refactored version, then a short bullet list of what you changed and why. As a final check, confirm the inputs and outputs still match the original for the same cases.

Use Agent Mode (OK Computer). Build a [TYPE OF SITE, e.g. landing page / portfolio / docs site] for [PROJECT / BUSINESS].
Audience: [AUDIENCE]. Goal of the site: [GOAL / DESIRED ACTION].
Pages / sections: [LIST SECTIONS]. Content to use: [PASTE COPY OR KEY POINTS]. Style: [BRAND / COLORS / TONE / REFERENCE SITES].
Constraints: [RESPONSIVE / SINGLE PAGE / NO BACKEND / FRAMEWORK]. Deliver the working site, then list what you built and how to edit each section.

Use Agent Mode (OK Computer). I've uploaded a design mock: [UPLOAD SCREENSHOT / FIGMA EXPORT / IMAGE].
Turn it into a working [FRAMEWORK, e.g. HTML/CSS / React] front end that matches the layout, spacing, and colors as closely as possible.
Make it responsive down to [BREAKPOINT]. Use [FONT / COLOR TOKENS] where I've specified them, otherwise infer from the mock. Keep the markup clean and semantic.
Deliver the code, then note any spot where the mock was ambiguous and what you assumed.

Use Agent Mode (OK Computer). Build a [NUMBER]-slide deck on [TOPIC] for [AUDIENCE].
Purpose: [PERSUADE / INFORM / PITCH]. Key points to cover, in order: [POINT 1], [POINT 2], [POINT 3]. Source material: [PASTE OR UPLOAD].
Style: [CLEAN / BOLD / CORPORATE + any brand colors]. One idea per slide, a clear headline on each, minimal text, and speaker notes underneath. Deliver the deck and an outline of the slide flow.

You are a writer for [AUDIENCE]. Write a [LENGTH]-word [PIECE TYPE] titled "[TITLE]" from this outline: [PASTE OUTLINE].
Tone: [TONE]. Lead each section with the takeaway, use short paragraphs and concrete examples, and cut clichés and filler. Output in clean Markdown with H2 sections and a two-line intro.

Rewrite the text below to be clearer and more direct without losing meaning. Cut filler, fix weak verbs, and keep my key terms.
Target tone: [TONE]. Reading level: [LEVEL].
Return the rewrite first, then a short bullet list of the main changes you made.
Text: [PASTE TEXT]

Repurpose this piece into content for other channels: [PASTE ARTICLE / TRANSCRIPT].
I want: [NUMBER] short social posts, a [LENGTH]-word newsletter blurb, and [NUMBER] headline options.
Keep my voice [TONE], stay faithful to the original points, and don't invent facts that aren't in the source. Label each output clearly.

Turn on Web search. Research this question and brief me: [RESEARCH QUESTION].
Cover: the current state, the main viewpoints, and where the evidence points. Prefer primary and recent sources.
Cite every source with a link, note the publication date next to each key fact, and end with a short synthesis of where sources agree and where they conflict.

Use Deep Research. Produce a report on [TOPIC / QUESTION] for a [WHO] reader who needs to [DECISION / GOAL].
Break it into: background, the key findings, the strongest counter-evidence, and a bottom-line recommendation. Prioritize recent, primary, and credible sources.
Cite every claim with a linked source and its date. At the end, list the open questions and what would resolve them.

Turn on Web search. Compare [OPTION A] and [OPTION B] for a [USE CASE] buyer.
Build a table: price, key features, real user complaints, and best-fit user. Pull from current reviews and forums, and cite every source with a link.
End with a clear recommendation for someone who cares most about [PRIORITY], and flag anything the sources disagreed on.

You are a pragmatic advisor. Draft a one-page plan for this idea: [DESCRIBE IDEA].
Cover: the problem, the target customer [TARGET CUSTOMER], the offer, how it makes money, the first three steps to validate it cheaply, and the biggest risk. Be blunt about weaknesses. Output as clear sections with no filler.

Turn these meeting notes into a clean summary: [PASTE OR UPLOAD NOTES].
Output three sections: Decisions made, Action items (as a table with Owner, Task, Due date), and Open questions. Keep it tight, don't invent details that aren't in the notes, and flag anything left unresolved.

Write an email from me ([MY ROLE]) to [RECIPIENT] about [TOPIC].
Goal: [WHAT I WANT TO HAPPEN]. Tone: [TONE]. Keep it under [WORD COUNT] words.
Open with the reason I'm writing, state the ask clearly, and end with a specific next step. Give me two subject-line options.

Explain [CONCEPT] to me. I currently know [YOUR LEVEL / WHAT YOU ALREADY UNDERSTAND].
Start with a plain-language explanation, then one concrete everyday analogy, then a worked example step by step. Finish with the single most common misconception about it and why it's wrong. Keep it concise and don't assume knowledge I didn't mention.

Make a study guide for [TOPIC / EXAM] at a [LEVEL] level from this material: [PASTE OR UPLOAD NOTES].
Give me: the key concepts as a bulleted outline, 8 flashcard-style Q&A pairs, and a 6-question quiz (mixed difficulty) with an answer key at the bottom. Base everything on the material provided, and mark anything you added from general knowledge.

Be my Socratic tutor for [SUBJECT / SKILL]. My level: [LEVEL]. My goal: [GOAL].
Don't just give answers — ask me one guiding question at a time, wait for my reply, and adjust based on what I get right or wrong. When I'm stuck, give a hint before the answer. Keep each turn short and end each one with the next question.